Explore

  • Home
  • Products
  • AI Search
  • Directories
  • Blog
  • Free PremiumFREE
  • Pricing

Your workspace

  • Dashboard
  • Products
  • Analytics
  • Streaks
  • Profile
  • Settings
LetsLaunch
New Launch
Loading…

LetsLaunch

Launch your product. Keep a real dofollow link for as long as your badge is up.

One email a week, top launches, unsubscribe any time.

Launch

This week's boardAll productsBest of the weekTop of the monthNew launch

Discover

CategoriesAlternativesCompareBlogLive activity

Company

AboutPricingHow it worksFAQContact

Legal

TermsPrivacyRefund policy

© 2026 LetsLaunch. Listings earn their dofollow links — we never sell them.

Featured on tinyshelfFree product launch directory for SaaS — LetsLaunch is listed on publishyoursaasView LetsLaunch on Better LaunchFeatured on DailyPingsLetsLaunch on ConfettiSaaSFeatured on BuildVoyageFeatured on PostYourStartupListed on Turbo0Launched on StartupBaseVerified on DANG!Find us on CodeHype
Advertise
N
Visit

Notiq

Turn any YouTube video into structured study notes.

AdvertisePromoted

Advertise here — $1

One small sidebar slot, one week, sitewide.

Last week's best

No launches last week yet.

Visit

Best startup directories

Every place worth listing a SaaS or AI product — with the ones that give real dofollow links marked.

Free & dofollow onlyTop 100 this month
Check DR

What’s your Domain Rating?

Free lookup straight from Ahrefs’ own public endpoint — no signup, and the same number they’d give you.

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Every AI Crawler That Hits Your Site, and What to Do About Each One
AISEO

Every AI Crawler That Hits Your Site, and What to Do About Each One

GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, Bytespider and a dozen more — what each one actually does, who runs it, and the robots.txt rule that matches what you're trying to opt into or out of.

LetsLaunch team·September 6, 2026·10 min read

On this page

  1. The three jobs a crawler can be doing
  2. OpenAI
  3. Anthropic
  4. Perplexity
  5. Google
  6. Apple
  7. Microsoft
  8. Meta
  9. Everyone else on the list
  10. What LetsLaunch actually does
  11. Writing the actual rule
  12. Checking whether it's actually working
  13. Does blocking GPTBot remove me from ChatGPT's answers?
  14. Does blocking Google-Extended hurt my Google ranking?
  15. Should I block the user-triggered fetchers like ChatGPT-User?

Every AI crawler identifies itself with a distinct user-agent string, and the strings do not map cleanly onto "AI" as one category. Some train models. Some power a live answer with a citation. Some only fetch a page because a person pasted its URL into a chat window a minute earlier. A robots.txt rule written against "AI bots" as if they were one thing usually does something other than what its author intended.

This is the reference list: every crawler we could verify, who operates it, what it actually does, and the specific robots.txt line for it. Use it to write the rule you actually mean, not the closest wildcard you found in someone else's blog post.

The three jobs a crawler can be doing

Before the table, the distinction that the whole list hangs on. A crawler identifying as AI-related is doing exactly one of three jobs:

  • Training. It fetches your pages to become part of a dataset a model is trained on, sometime later, in a batch you have no visibility into. Blocking it has no effect on anything that happens today.
  • Retrieval and citation. It fetches your pages to build or refresh an index that a live answer engine — ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Copilot — reads from at answer time. Blocking it removes you from those answers, full stop.
  • User-triggered fetch. Nobody crawls anything. A person pasted your URL, or asked about it by name, and the assistant fetched that one page, once, live, to answer that one question. This isn't a crawl in the ordinary sense — it's the assistant acting as the user's browser for a single request.

We laid out the training-versus-retrieval split in more depth in why ChatGPT can't see your site; this post exists to give every crawler its own row instead of two examples.

OpenAI

CrawlerJobRecommendation
GPTBotTrains OpenAI's models. Respects robots.txt, per OpenAI's own published crawler documentation.Block if you want out of training; costs nothing in ChatGPT's answers. Allow if you're fine being training data.
OAI-SearchBotPowers ChatGPT Search's retrieval and citation index. A separate crawler from GPTBot, launched alongside ChatGPT Search in October 2024.Allow, unless you want to be invisible to ChatGPT Search entirely.
ChatGPT-UserUser-triggered: someone inside ChatGPT pasted or asked about your specific URL and the assistant fetched it live. Not a routine crawl.Allow. Blocking it means a real person who linked to you gets nothing back, for no gain — there's no dataset being built to opt out of.

Anthropic

CrawlerJobRecommendation
ClaudeBotAnthropic's primary training crawler, functionally parallel to GPTBot.Block for the same reason as GPTBot: opts out of training, changes nothing about Claude's live answers.
Claude-SearchBotRetrieval and citation crawler, parallel to OAI-SearchBot.Allow if you want to be citable in Claude's answers.
Claude-UserUser-triggered fetch, parallel to ChatGPT-User.Allow, same reasoning as ChatGPT-User.

OpenAI and Anthropic both explicitly support the training/retrieval split — that's the entire reason two separate crawlers exist per company instead of one. If you want out of training but still want to be citable, that's not a compromise you're forcing on the system; it's the exact use case the split was built for.

Perplexity

CrawlerJobRecommendation
PerplexityBotPerplexity's primary crawler, builds its retrieval and citation index.Allow if you want to appear in Perplexity's answers. Block only if you want out entirely — there's no separate training-only variant to opt out of instead.
Perplexity-UserUser-triggered fetch, parallel to ChatGPT-User.Allow, same reasoning as the other user-triggered fetchers.

Google

CrawlerJobRecommendation
GooglebotOrdinary search crawler. Required to rank in Google Search at all.Allow. This is not an AI-crawler decision — blocking it removes you from Google Search, not from an AI feature.
Google-ExtendedAn opt-out signal specifically for Google's AI training uses (Gemini, AI features). Separate from Googlebot.Block if you want out of Google's AI training. Blocking it does not affect Google Search ranking — that's the entire point of it existing as its own token.

This is the pair people mix up most often, because both names start with "Google" and only one of them touches your search rankings. Googlebot and Google-Extended are read by Google's systems for entirely different purposes, and disallowing the wrong one either does nothing or costs you your search visibility, depending on which way you get it backwards.

Apple

CrawlerJobRecommendation
ApplebotOrdinary crawler behind Siri and Spotlight search features.Allow, unless you specifically want out of Apple's search surfaces.
Applebot-ExtendedApple's AI-training opt-out signal, parallel in purpose to Google-Extended. Separate from ordinary Applebot.Block if you want out of Apple's AI training without touching Siri/Spotlight visibility.

Microsoft

CrawlerJobRecommendation
BingbotMicrosoft's ordinary search crawler — and also the retrieval backbone behind Copilot's web-grounded answers. Plays double duty the way Googlebot does for Google, except Microsoft hasn't split it into two tokens.Allow. Blocking it costs you both Bing Search ranking and Copilot citations at once, because there's no separate opt-out for one without the other.

Meta

CrawlerJobRecommendation
Meta-ExternalAgentMeta's AI-training crawler, for Llama and Meta AI features.Block if you want out of training for Meta's models.
Meta-ExternalFetcherUser-triggered fetch, parallel to ChatGPT-User, for links a user shares with Meta AI.Allow, same reasoning as the other user-triggered fetchers.

Everyone else on the list

CrawlerOperatorJobRecommendation
AmazonbotAmazonCrawls for Amazon's AI/Alexa-related features.Allow unless you specifically want out of Amazon's AI features — no training/retrieval split is documented for it.
DuckAssistBotDuckDuckGoPowers DuckDuckGo's AI-assisted answer feature.Allow if you want to be citable in DuckDuckGo's AI answers; this is a retrieval crawler, so blocking it removes you from those answers.
BytespiderByteDance (owner of TikTok)Crawls to power TikTok search, content recommendations, and ByteDance's own AI features.Your call — bundles search, recommendations and AI training into one crawler with no separate opt-out for any one piece.
CCBotCommon CrawlA nonprofit that crawls the open web and republishes the dataset for anyone to use — researchers and AI labs included. Not itself an AI company, but its dataset is a common ingredient in many models' training data.Block if your goal is keeping content out of AI training generally, since the dataset feeds more than one lab at once. Allow if you're fine contributing to open research datasets.
DiffbotDiffbot (commercial web-data extraction)Crawls on behalf of its own customers to supply structured data for AI training, search, and retrieval-augmented generation products.Treat like CCBot: it's a pass-through to unknown downstream customers rather than one named consumer product, so block it if you want a hard boundary on who resells your content.
TimpibotTimpiBuilds a decentralized search engine's index and collects training data for LLMs. Smaller and less well-known than the crawlers above, but real and documented.Allow or block on the same logic as any other combined search/training crawler — there's no split to take advantage of.
cohere-aiCohereTraining/retrieval crawler for Cohere's models.Allow if you want to be usable by Cohere's products; block to opt out. LetsLaunch's own robots.txt names this one explicitly rather than relying on a wildcard.
MistralAI-UserMistral AITraining/retrieval crawler for Mistral's models.Same logic as cohere-ai. LetsLaunch's robots.txt names this one too.

What LetsLaunch actually does

Our own robots.txt (src/app/robots.ts in this codebase) names sixteen agents explicitly in an AI_SEARCH_AGENTS group and allows all of them, including cohere-ai and MistralAI-User alongside the bigger names — a listing cited inside any of these answer engines is worth as much to a maker as an ordinary search result, so we chose visibility over opting out. The code comment on that group is direct about the user-triggered fetchers too: ChatGPT-User, Claude-User and Perplexity-User ignore robots.txt by design, so naming them there is a statement of intent, not a control that actually stops anything.

That's our call for a directory that exists to get products seen. It is not a universal recommendation. A publisher with a subscription paywall, or content it doesn't want folded into a model's training data regardless of citation upside, has a legitimate reason to block the training crawlers on this list while leaving the retrieval and user-triggered ones alone — that split is exactly what separate tokens like GPTBot/OAI-SearchBot and ClaudeBot/Claude-SearchBot are for.

Writing the actual rule

Robots.txt groups by user-agent are independent — a crawler that finds a group naming it by name ignores the * group entirely, so a specific agent needs its own disallow lines if you want to block just that one:

User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: ClaudeBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
Allow: /

User-agent: *
Allow: /

That example opts out of OpenAI and Anthropic training specifically while staying allowed everywhere else, including for OAI-SearchBot's retrieval index. Copy the shape, not the specific agents — decide per crawler, from the tables above, rather than pasting a blanket AI-blocking snippet that treats every name on this page as the same decision.

Checking whether it's actually working

A robots.txt rule is a request, not an enforcement mechanism — the polite crawlers on this list respect it, but the file itself can't verify anything. Once you've written the rule you mean, two different checks matter and they answer different questions. Our AI crawler check fetches your page as each named crawler once and shows you the status code and the content each one received right now — useful for confirming a rule change took effect. For whether a crawler actually shows up over time, on its own schedule, we wrote a separate guide to grepping logs and reading Cloudflare's AI Crawlers dashboard — that's an ongoing question a one-time fetch can't answer.

If you're launching a product and want it reachable by name across these answer engines in the first place, a LetsLaunch listing is one more independent page describing it the same way your own site does.

Does blocking GPTBot remove me from ChatGPT's answers?

No. GPTBot only collects training data; OAI-SearchBot is the separate crawler that builds the index behind ChatGPT Search's citations. Blocking GPTBot opts you out of training runs and has no effect on whether ChatGPT can cite you — only blocking OAI-SearchBot does that.

Does blocking Google-Extended hurt my Google ranking?

No. Google-Extended is a distinct opt-out token for Google's AI training uses, separate from Googlebot, which is the ordinary search crawler required for ranking in Google Search at all. Blocking Google-Extended leaves Googlebot and your search ranking untouched.

Should I block the user-triggered fetchers like ChatGPT-User?

Usually not. ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User and Meta-ExternalFetcher don't crawl your site on a schedule — they fetch one page, once, because a real person pasted your link or asked about it by name inside that assistant. Blocking them doesn't opt you out of any training dataset; it means that specific person gets nothing back.

ShareXLinkedInHacker NewsReddit·on LetsLaunch

Keep reading

  • ChatGPT vs Google AI Overviews vs Perplexity: Where to Put Limited EffortThree products, three different audiences, three different ways of deciding what to cite. A founder with limited time needs to know which one actually rewards the effort before spending any of it.9 min read
  • llms.txt in 2026: We Publish One. Here's What It Actually Does.Google has said plainly it doesn't use llms.txt. A 137,000-domain study found 97% of published files get zero requests, ever. We still publish one — here's why that isn't a contradiction.5 min read
  • GPTBot Says It Visits Your Site. Here's How to Check, Every Week.A curl check tells you what a crawler receives once. It tells you nothing about whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot actually show up on a Tuesday in October. Here's how to monitor that on an ongoing basis.7 min read

What's live on LetsLaunch right now

  • PixyLive visual interface between humans and coding agents
  • PublishYourSaaSA curated directory for indie makers and SaaS founders.
  • TalmaaraYour world proofreads your book.
Submit your own launch →See today's leaderboard →